Tag Archives: bizarre conversations I have had

The Trouble With Human Tails

A short while ago I was a participant in one of those circular ‘what-if’ conversations in which my friends and I considered what we’d put on our wishlist if we could have influenced the evolution of the human body which, lets face it, is a kluge. A work in progress. (And probably not in the right direction.)

One friend put her orders in for sharks’ teeth. Not for their pointiness and general fiersomeness, but for their ability to regrow after falling out. This would be very handy indeed.

By the time I was asked for my two pennies’ worth regarding anthropological improvements, all the good suggestions had been taken so I offered human tails. I suppose at the time I was imagining long, muscular tails reminiscent of a wallaby’s, the sort that would require extra holes in our trousers. (The logistics of clothing also came up.) Chairs and toilets would require a complete rethink, which would influence home design. On the upside, depending on the ‘dexterity’ of the tail, you might be able to wipe the coffee table down with a cloth shaped as a tail sleeve while at the same time dusting the bookshelf with your hands, or even reading a book.

photo by Terry Bain

As we had this conversation, a friend’s dog trotted past, and I suppose I might have been subconsciously inspired by this sight, to be honest. Because this little terrier was happy as Larry, and its tail wagged excitedly as it played with the kids on the grass.

This got me wondering whether tails would be under humans’ conscious control. A great wagging tail would be a true liability if we were at a funeral, say, not-so-secretly pleased that the bane of our lives had finally kicked the bucket. A dog’s emotions are so readily accessible just by observing its tail, which is the endearing thing about dogs, but would not be an advantage in human-world, where social smiling, appropriate hand gestures and faux confidence do wonders  in advancing status and greasing social cogs.

Of course, if you go back far enough in prehistory, our ancestors did have tails once, hence the ‘tail bone’.  It’s called the coccyx, which may come in handy for Scrabble. So stick that one up your sleeve for later. Also, some people are born with ‘soft tails’. (Nobody believed me at the time, and none of us had actually seen one in real life, but it would seem to be true.)

You’ve no doubt heard of people who experience ‘phantom pain’ in limbs which have been removed. An example in the news this week is a 57-year-old woman whose right hand was amputated after a car crash when she was 18.

[RN] has never had a right index finger: she was born with a congenital deformity that gave her only the rudiment of a thumb, immobile ring and middle fingers, and no index finger at at all. More than 35 years after the amputation, she feels pain in a phantom right hand, which has five—not four—fully mobile fingers.

- from Discover Magazine

Since we live in a bizarre and wacky world, I’m wondering how many individuals suffer pain in a phantom tail. Surely there must be some, if not living now, over the course of history? Naturally, there would be many more instances of phantom tails if we actually had tails, because a good number of those would suffer amputations after unfortunate events.

So I’d probably go with the renewable teeth modification. Which, by the way, may not be so far fetched.

The King of Pointless Argument

A friend of my husband’s called late one night. There wasn’t anything on the telly, except for Underbelly, which wasn’t on for another hour, so our friend decided to bide his time by lying on his bed and yakking on the phone.

It was me who answered his call.

This friend of ours used to flat with my husband during their university days, and even back then, had a reputation for a love of argument. He argues for the sport of it, and can play devil’s advocate without ever letting on. This makes him seem like someone who flips about all over the place, politically, morally and otherwise, because one day he’ll be arguing black, and when you see him six months later he’ll be arguing the same thing white. Once I argued that abstract art is pointless. He disagreed vehemently. Months earlier, he’d said exactly the same thing himself. Vehemently.

He has also finished writing his novella.

“What’s it about?” I asked, rather stupidly.

“Well, it’s kind of hard to describe. It hasn’t got a plot.”

“What do you mean, it hasn’t got a plot? You can’t write 20k words without something of a plot.”

“Nope. No plot. No plot whatsoever. Nothing happens.”

“Impossible.”

And we were on the phone, pretty much like that, for an entire hour. Had Underbelly not aired that evening, we’d have gone on all night and into the following morning.

In sum:

Our man thinks some novels are completely without plot, even if they don’t count as stream-of-consciousness. He says he has author friends whose definition of ‘plot’ will back up his own; their definition is writerly rather than general, and he’s using the ‘writers’ definition’ rather than any alternative definition which may be floating among the general populace.

And here’s what I think. Bollocks. If it ain’t stream-of-consciousness, of which I am no fan, story’s got to have a plot.

My argument: We can’t forget the original sense of ‘plot’, which comes from the verb. You can’t write something without having first ‘plotted’ it to some extent in your mind… Even if you haven’t plotted in advance. Plotting on the fly is still plotting. Therefore, any result on paper has been plotted. Ergo if something has been plotted, it must has ‘A Plot’. (‘Ergo’ always makes you seem as if you know what you’re talking about. Noticed?)

Months later, I still haven’t asked to read this friend’s novel; nor has he offered to let me read it so, as far as I’m concerned, the thing has got some sort of plot, however unstructured and meandering it may well be.

It wasn’t an entirely pointless discussion, however. When I got off the phone (suffering one sore ear) my husband asked what on earth we’d been arguing about for an entire hour. The single side that he could hear hadn’t sounded the slightest bit intelligible.

After I had summarised in bullet points — to glazed eyes — my husband said, “You know, sometimes you just gotta hang up on that guy. That’s how he works.”

And I know that’s how his male friends treat him. Me? I’ve been acculturated into being more polite. (Plus I might have similar tendencies myself. Who knows.)

But the reason that wasn’t a pointless discussion: Round here we now have a new reference point for entirely useless arguments. If ever an argument gets out-of-hand, irresolvable and ridiculous, someone will end up saying, “But it doesn’t have a plot!”

*

AND IN CASE HE RINGS AGAIN BECAUSE HE’S BORED OF WAITING FOR UNDERBELLY, I HAVE A LITTLE SOMETHING UP MY SLEEVE.

Can a plot ever be likely?

To quote John Irving from his essay ‘The King Of The Novel’:

But what about the plot? his critics ask. Aren’t his plots unlikely?

Oh boy; are they ever ‘unlikely’! I wonder how many people who call a plot ‘unlikely’ ever realize that they do not like any plot at all. The nature of plot is unlikely And if you’ve been reading a great many contemporary novels, you’re probably unused to encountering much in the way of plot there; should you encounter one now, you’d be sure to find it unlikely. Yet when the British sailed off to their little war with Argentina in 1982, they used the luxury liner, the Queen Elizabeth II, of course — to salvage, at the very least, what people call a ‘moral victory’. Imagine that! But we accept far more unlikely events in the news than we accept in fiction. Fiction is, and has to be, better made than the news; plots, even the most unlikely ones, are better made than real life, too.

And then he goes on to write about the marriage of Charles Dickens, which is actually more unlikely than the plots he came up with in his novels.

Apparently. I’ve still not got around to reading any Dickens.

 

How many bloggers does it take to change a lightbulb?

by MichaelKuhn_pics

 

Him: [upon entry] Why does that ladder keep shifting?

Me: It doesn’t keep shifting. It’s been right there in the doorway for days.

Him: It always feels like it’s right in my way.

Me: Yeah. I changed the lightbulbs though. Did you notice it’s a lot brighter in here?

Him: Yes. I did notice. Was it hard?

Me: [aware of all the lightbulb jokes which abound] It was harder than you think.

Him: Oh, I think pretty hard.

Related Link: So, how many bloggers does it take to change a lightbulb? Answer here.

Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.

by Lakenvelder

Two year old: Mum! There’s smoke!

Me: Oh yeah. Smoke on the hills. Clouds and clouds of smoke.

Two year old: Not clouds. Smoke!

Me: Oh. Okay. There must be a fire somewhere behind those trees.

Two year old: No. No fire. Smoke!

0001000111

KMC Designs

 

Me: Hey, can you throw me down some socks?

Him: What do you mean?

Me: Grab me some socks and throw them down, will you?

Him: Why would I do that?

Me: Saves me getting off my backside.

Him: Oh. Throw the socks down to you, you mean? I thought you meant throw them down on the floor.

Me: Why would I want you to do that?

Him: I don’t know.

Me: Your mind works like a computer.

Him: I know.

Lurking

photo by magh

Him: How’s your short story going?

Me: Good. I haven’t actually started writing it yet.

Him: What have you been doing all morning?

Me: Working on it.

Him: Lurking on it?

Me: No, ‘working’ on it. (FYI Doing research into podiatry and whether human cadavers actually fart after death. My search history is rotten.)

Him: Hmm. I quite like ‘lurking’ as a metaphor, as in you ‘lurk’ around thinking about stuff, writing stuff down and then when it’s cooked you POUNCE on the story and knock it out.

Me: Yeah. That’s not too bad. That’s how it works.

The Make-Believe Emmys Invitation

Him: Does my hair look all right?

Me: Looks fine.

Him: Oh, cos sometimes I miss a bit at the back. (Turns away, hoping  for an inspection.)

Me: Nope, it looks fine. For your purposes.

Him: What’s that supposed to mean?

Me: I mean, it’s not exactly an ‘award winning haircut’, now, is it? You’re not going to be admired and revered for your hair. It’ll do. (Anyway, the worst jobs eventually grow out, if not better.)

Him: Yeah. I guess I’m not off to the Emmys or anything. I’m not going to appear at the back of one of those women’s magazines, with some hair critic bagging out my hair.

Him: But then, you never know when you’re going to need a good haircut. I might get an invite in the post.

Me: To the Emmys?

Him: You Never Know. They might a got whiff of my game. (He coded an arcade style computer game last year.)

Me: You’re more likely to get an invite than I am, that’s true. Hang on. Nope. They might get a whiff of one of my short stories. They might have scouts reading minor ezine publications. They might want to turn it into a Hollywood film. (I have no idea who ‘they’ refers to, but you know.)

Him: Yeah. That’s possible.

Him: So, who would have want playing your characters?

Me: Which story?

Him: (searching brain for anything I’ve written. Anything at all…) The one about the rubbish truck.

Me: Hmm. Toni Colette.

Him: Not Scarlett Johannsen, as the rubbish truck driver?

Me: Nope. It’s set in Australia. The actors would have to be Australian.

Him: Who’d you get to drive the rubbish truck?

Me: I’m thinking of an actress but I can’t think of her name. She looks like Madonna…

Him: Nicole Kidman?

Me: …only weathered. See, that’s what happens when you interrupt.

Him: You’re still thinking about it, aren’t you? Who you’d like to play in your rubbish truck story.

Me: (meekly) Yeah.

(For the record, the rubbish truck story hasn’t even been accepted for publication. Yet.)

Hopeless Before Coffee

pic by H is for Home

Me: Cuppa?

Him: Yes please.

(This bit of the conversation could be circumvented by now, but it always goes:)

Me: What of?

Him: Tea.

Me: What kind of tea?

(See? We have many kinds of tea in this house. The deal should be: If I ask you if you want a ‘cuppa’ you should say, ‘Yes please, I’ll have a cup of peppermint green.’ Or whatever.)

Me: (surprised face) You usually have coffee in the mornings.

Him with crook guts: Yes but I’ll stay away from it this morning. Coffee’s a… um…

Me: A diuretic.

Him: Yes, but it’s also a… um…

Me: A stimulant.

Him: Yes, but it’s also a… um…

Me: An irritant.

Him: Yes.

Half a Conversation About a Banana

pic by satanslaundromat

I’m not a fan of bananas. There are various reasons for this, but mainly it’s because of half a conversation I had with a friend in a cafeteria ten years ago.

Him: “I forgot my lunch.”

Me: “I have a spare banana if you’re interested.”

Him: “I’ll be right. I’m not a huge fan of bananas.”

Me: “Beggars can’t be choosers. Go on. Get it et.”

Him: “No really, I just don’t like bananas.”

Me: “What have you got against bananas?”

Him: “It’s nothing personal.”

Me: “Go on, tell me. Is it the texture? Is that it? Is it that little black bit you always find at the end? Is it the fact you can’t help feeling like a monkey? Is it a little too phallic for you? Go on, fess up.”

Him: “None of the above. I won’t tell you now, because you’re about to hoe into that banana yourself. Suffice to say, this story I have in my head is so disgusting that I’ve been put off bananas ever since. I wouldn’t want to do the same to you.”

Me: “Aw, go on. I’ve got a strong stomach.” *blatant lie*

Him: “Another time.”

*

I ate my banana, mainly because I’d heard they’re good for you. The conversation moved on. Some weeks later, we found ourselves in a similar situation i.e. eating lunch together in the cafeteria – only me without a banana this time.

Me: “Oh yeah, tell me that disgusting story about a banana.”

Him: “What story?”

Me: “You know, the one you were going to tell me about weeks ago except you didn’t because you didn’t want to put me off my lunch, considerate fellow that you are.”

Him: “I don’t remember that conversation.”

Me: “Oh come on, don’t do that to me. You know the story. You said it was so digusting it’s put you off bananas for good. You can’t have just forgotten.”

Him: “No, that can’t have been me. I have no idea what you’re on, but I am not anti-banana, as you claim.”

*

He still hasn’t remembered. After a decade, I doubt he’s going to have some amazing recollection. I still wonder what on earth it was.

Short passages in books can have similar effects. Have you ever read a passage in a book which comes back to haunt you in specific situations?

  • When someone throws up on a plane I think of The Hot Zone.
  • When I see a swarm of fruit flies I think of Prey by Michael Crichton.
  • When I throw up into a toilet I think of Trainspotting. The most bizarre thing is, I’ve never got through that book. I’ve never even watched the movie. I think of Trainspotting only because of someone else’s description of that scene. That’s how gross it must have been.

Those are the gross ones, since I’m thinking of bananas, but not all my examples are gross. Whenever I see a sponge floating around in a bucket of water I’m reminded of a Joanna Trollope novel in which a sponge floats round in a bucket of water. When it comes to writing, god really does live in the details.

Tenuously Related But Interesting Link: How bad are bananas?